Skip to main content

The Story Of World's Longest Human Chain - Bihar Manav Shrinkhla


Manav Shrinkhla

On January 21, 2018, (the people of) Bihar assembled together to form a human chain, the manav shrinkhla. It was the world's longest human chain ever formed. Last year, exactly on the same date, Bihar had formed a similar human chain to show their firm stand against alcoholism. At that moment, it was also claimed and publicized as the largest human chain ever formed in the world. But this year, it has been covered only as a news and not discussed widely on the Op-ed page. So, probably I’m filling the spaces our mediawallahs has left empty.


For your information, a human chain is a demonstration by the masses to show political solidarity, for or against a cause, in which people link arms with one another to form a large chain. Usually, the organizers of such event put an exaggerated data to the public in order to show how genuine their concern is. Still, it's a universal method to win support and encouragement of the public.



We can say that Bihar government has actually celebrated its human-chain-making-anniversary by making another human chain, bigger than the earlier one. This time, the claim is of forming a statewide human chain of over 13,000 km long, which earlier in 2017, was estimated to be around 11292 km. Bihar breaking its own record appears to be an undisputed claim, the gullibility of which stems from its population size as it comes only on the third position. But let's not get into the record making and breaking part, and instead focus on the purpose behind it. This time the purpose of forming manav shrinkhla was to create awareness against two ‘alleged’ social evils — Child-Marriage and the Dowry practice.

Nitish’s moral stunt

With the ongoing campaign of his government’s against dowry and child-marriage, Nitish Kumar has furthered his policy of bringing a social reform in Bihar and reinforced his image of a social reformer. But, how significant is it? Is this the biggest problem Bihar is facing? or, it’s a stunt to garner attention and support of Biharis? The intensity with which Nitish government is campaigning against these 'social evils', these questions become essential to be answered.

So, is it Nitish Kumar's drama? The answer can't be monosyllabic ‘yes’ or ‘no’. But, it can be reasoned on the basis of current trends and facts. Like other Indian states, Bihar has significantly improvized in reducing child-marriage cases to such an extent that makes it trivial and insignificant. The practice has been discontinued even in rural areas and can only be observed in immensely backward and tribal and remote areas, those disconnected with the mainstream political sphere.

Let’s discuss dowry

India is a country where the practice of dowry has been prevalent in one form or another, but as it's a consensual act having links with marriage rituals, this long-standing but slightly immoral practice exists in the society despite having been secured by the law, the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961.

According to the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961, dowry means any property or valuable security given or agreed to be given, either directly or indirectly, by one party to a marriage to the other party to the marriage; or by the parents of either party to a marriage or by any other person, to either party to the marriage or to any other person;at or before or any time after the marriage in connection with the marriage of said parties.

That's a boring legal definition for something well-known. The truth is, it is not even considered as illegal, which is why the problem of dowry is seated deep in the society. Bihar ranks only second in the country, after neighbouring Uttar Pradesh, in dowry-related cases. It needs to be mentioned that since Bihar is opening up, it doesn't imply the fact of these 'social evils' being exclusive to Bihar.

Final Remark

Dowry is already illegal, it is in practice, no doubt. And, child-marriage is almost negligible. If we look at his political career, he never shied away from taking risks. The breakup with BJP, forming an impractical grand alliance, the 'mahagathbandhan', taking strong decisions like booze ban, not becoming corrupt or support his partner's blatant corruption out of political pressure, etc, etc. The list could be really long. Then, why Nitish Kumar is taking so much interest in these “social-evils’ is beyond my understanding.

The major issues Bihar is battling with is the despicable quality of education and the rampant migration rate. These are grave problems to Bihar, more than alcohol or, dowry or, child marriage. Making long human chain is no achievement, though making the state free from alcohol and dowry, can be regarded as achievements. But if Bihar's Vikash-Purush Nitish babu really wants to become a great reformer, he needs to act on the important public issues first. Otherwise, he will be reduced to mere as a feminist.


To reuse the content, please seek permission. You are free to share though. Goodbye!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Exploring the Anglo-Norman Period in English Literature

 The Anglo-Norman period in English literature, roughly spanning from the Norman Conquest of 1066 to the mid-14th century, represents a pivotal era of transformation in the literary landscape of England. This period, initiated by William the Conqueror’s victory at the Battle of Hastings, brought profound cultural and linguistic changes that reshaped the production and development of literature in England. Below, we explore this dynamic period by examining its historical context, the dominance of French and Latin literature, the persistence and evolution of English literary traditions, and the lasting influence on the trajectory of English literature. Historical and Linguistic Context The Norman Conquest of 1066 marked a significant turning point for England, introducing a new ruling class of Norman French speakers. This event established a linguistic hierarchy : French became the language of the court, administration, and the elite; Latin remained the language of the church and sch...

Does India As A State Obliged Towards Her Citizens For Providing Them Employment?

As the Modi-led BJP government has failed to rescue India from Job crisis in its five-year term, the question is whether the government has done enough to maintain the equilibrium in the job market of the country? And whether or not the government should be held liable for creating this crisis in the first place? Screenshot from movie 3 idiots Article 41 {Right to work, to education and to public assistance in certain cases} under DPSP says: “The State shall, within the limits of its economic capacity and development, make effective provision for securing the right to work, to education and to public assistance in cases of unemployment, old age, sickness and disablement, and in other cases of undeserved want.” The DPSP cannot be enforced by any court, but the principles laid down in this part are nevertheless fundamental in the governance of the country, and it should be the duty of the State to apply these principles in making laws. We also need to look back to Mo...

How Good Is Modi As A Reformer - An Analysis Of Modi's India

Before Prime Minister Modi's US visit and the first ever Modi-Trump meeting, several global media houses have analyzed the three years of Modi's government. They are doing their best to highlight the failure of the Modi government, downplaying all the achievements of India during three years. Of all those, the Economist magazine's analysis, I think, is the one that deserves good attention. According to the Economist, prime minister Narendra Modi is not much as a big reformer as he seems . In the beginning, the article gives some credit to Modi for boosting the economic growth of India. It says, before the arrival of Modi, India was growing at a relatively slower rate of 6.4% than after the 2014 election. In 2015, India became the world's fastest growing economy with a growth rate of 7.9%. It also mentioned the economic reforms like GST and Bankruptcy law which have been successfully passed by the legislature. But, then, it says "These facts are decei...