Skip to main content

Making A Difference — Indian Media And Ravish Kumar


Today's Bulletin: Priya Prakash Varrier’s killing wink, Taimur’s daily schedule, 'Rashtramata' Padmavati, Donald Trump tweets, Different types of jihad - love jihad, hate jihad, cow jihad, North Korea’s ‘mental dictator’ Kim Jong Un's preparation for a nuclear war, and last, but not the least —An esteemed panel of 'alleged' experts and politicians engaging in an ‘alleged’ debate.

If you are a consumer of Indian media, particularly the news channels, you might have got the idea of what my opening words are and where I’m trying to point it. If you think, all mediawallahs (media personnel) are same, or that these are really important topics worthy of your time, you need to think again.

Ravish Kumar Government Job Series
Ravish during his hate-speech
There is a 'proven' left-wing terrorist, and an atheist, perhaps, NDTV journo named Ravish Kumar who is different. The non-Hindi Indian states might not have heard his name. He is not interested in covering ‘big stories’, no loud debates, no panel of Pakistani alleged ‘defence experts’ to assault verbally and come out as a national hero. But, watch him with caution, you might be tagged as anti-national. (no pun intended)

Ravish Kumar is one of the best popular anchor/journalists in the present age of Indian media. Though all sorts of people appreciate Ravish’s work, he has a direct influence on the youths of this country. And among the youths, he is incredibly popular among those in underprivileged class and the college-going students. And, of course, in JNU, which needs a special mention.


A few years back, I had a conversation with one of my friend who happened to be a Ravish’s fan. I, just for fun, called Ravish as Rubbish. But, he got offended with that and said: tujhe toh woh zee news wala dalal accha lagta hoga (your favourite must be that zee news tout). I wasn't offended. There was no reason to be offended. Neither ‘zee news wala dalal’ was my favourite, nor I’ve been a hardcore fan of any other journalist. I used to watch Arnab Goswami at Times Now, but I didn't tell him. I also used to outrage over issues raised by him on Twitter. Now, I realized, how I wasted my time and energy on Arnab’s ghatiya (senseless) ‘newshour’— an ‘alleged’ news show.

After attaining some enlightenment, I stopped watching news channels. Everyone seems to be promoting his own agenda. For news, I just rely on newspapers, but that's too, not in detail. My unsolicited advice would be that, even if someone recommends you to watch TV debates for enhancing 'group discussion' skills, think thrice before actually start watching news debates. In a job interview GD, if you behave like anyone of those unruly Netas or the one claiming to be an expert, your rejection is guaranteed. Note it somewhere.


Coming back to Ravish, I find his fans real and solid. They become his fan because he raises their genuine problem. He, therefore, holds an incredible power — trust and credibility of the youths, which is a blessing. It's up to him whether he utilizes the divine power in some good use, or rather misuse it, as it is often used to brainwash youths by a terror outfit. Modi, too, had this trust before the 2014 election, he still retains a significant part of that, but it is in a declining phase. The ‘Exam Warrior’ written by the PM, or in his name, is an attempt to secure this trust. Nevertheless, this trust and respect I’m talking about must not be mistaken with that of Dr Kalam’s. You know a Neta or a journalist cannot enjoy such admiration of the masses, no matter how big or influential they are. The unexpected pouring of love to Ravish mostly stems from the degrading standards of TV news and with a trend of an unholy boxing match debate culture.

The Pakoda debate

Indian Media And Ravish Kumar
Is Pakoda-selling an employment?
It started with an episode PM Modi’s Mann ki baat in which he said, ‘agar koi naujawaan pakoda bhi bech raha hai toh wo bhi ek rozgaar hai.’ (If a youth is engaged in pakoda-selling business, it too is a means of employment)

Now, If you're a Bhakt (BJP supporter) —who don’t listen to Modi’s Mann Ki Baat— you'll say, what's wrong? Isn’t it true?

If you're anti-Modi —who listen to Modi’s Mann Ki Baat with great interest (for outraging on social media)— you'll say, rozgaar nahi de paya isliye pakoda bechne ko rozgaar bata raha hai. (Unable to provide jobs, Modi is now glorifying pakoda-selling business).

If you're free from party politics and still unemployed, you might have listened to PM’s Mann Ki Baat but only with half-heartedness, as you don’t have to outrage later.

And, if you're free from party politics and employed too, you would not have listened to Mann Ki Baat, neither watched Ravish’s Prime Time and, certainly not read this blog post.

Amit Shah ne pakode wali baat ko jumla nahi bataya hai. Lagta hai sarkar is mamle me kaafi gambhir hai. (Amit Shah has not declared pakoda remark of the PM as ‘jumla’. Seems government is quite serious about this matter.)

(to be continued...) 

Till then think: Is Pakoda-selling an employment?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Padmavaat Circus — A Brief Summary

OVER THE LAST FEW MONTHS, the nation has witnessed a bizarre issue. We have been battling with the question of whether a film should be allowed to screen or not. It is definitely a matter of concern if a movie is not allowed to be showcased, and even more if the makers and artists receive threats. But, don't you think we gave it more importance than what it really deserved? It certainly was not worthy of the space for prime time debates every single day as if it is the “only” thing India is concerned about. From the beginning, I was appalled by the duration of time Padmavati remain in the news. After the news, they do a stupid TV debate about the same. We then also saw TV anchors giving a "no-objection certificate" to the movie happily. It was at a time when the film had not been even sent to the CBFC.  But, there was a journalist/anchor who was showing the educational crisis in the country instead of a frivolous debate of whether Padmavati to be allowed to rel...

The Story Behind WhatsApp Stirring Campaign To Stop Fake News And Rumours In India

After the government's timely reprimand to the ridiculously popular messaging app famous for reducing the barrier of distance between people, making business communication and note sharing easier — all with high privacy; and equally infamous for propagating provocative messages, fake news and rumours which, on several occasions, have resulted in the creation of a violent and murderous mob even costing lives of many, and then showing middle finger to the law enforcement bodies along with the judiciary, the app now appears to be taking things a little more seriously. The government, on last year, had slapped the Facebook-owned WhatsApp with legal notices with a clear warning that it would consider the messaging platform as an abettor in the spread of toxic rumours resulting in disharmony among citizens with law and order problems for the state, and will have to face the legal consequences in failing to put adequate checks for the same. As the world's largest democracy w...

Indian Rupee Demonetisation: Why It Cannot End Corruption Or Even Black Money

It was November 8, when Prime Minister Narendra Modi, in a dramatic announcement, decided to scrap or demonetise two high-value Indian currency of the denomination of ₹500 and ₹1000. It means 85% of currency in circulation will no longer be a legal tender. All that precious notes have been converted into wastepaper overnight. It became the biggest talking point in every Indian household  —  from Kashmir to Kanyakumari and from Kutch to Arunachal Pradesh. After all, in a country where 98% of all transactions are conducted in cash, it was a big jolt. Demonetisation is usually associated with degrading economies and hyperinflation and often done by military dictatorships. It was surprising that a popular and democratically elected prime minister of a booming economy has resorted to demonetisation. Black money is the money held by people that have evaded taxation. It is illegal hoarding of unaccounted money which tends to exacerbate inequality because the biggest evas...

The Triple Talaq Bill: A Final Step To Settle Gender Justice Debate Among Muslims

  Pixabay I’ve written a post earlier on the issue of triple talaq in June last year when the government opposed that in the Supreme Court. The SC held that talaq-e-biddat or instant triple talaq is unconstitutional, arbitrary and thus declared it void. Now, the legislation is being done with the continuation of the judicial declaration, with a triple talaq bill already been passed in the Lok Sabha and waiting to be passed in the Rajya Sabha. The bill shall provide a legal right to the Muslim women against this practice and make it a "criminal and non-bailable offence". But, some Islamic scholars and ‘secular’ politicians are questioning the authority of the Parliament. Isn’t it the Legislature that is formally authorised to initiate and bring reform in the society? Triple talaq is an unjust practice that has been carried out in independent India which is shameful. This practice has been even discontinued in many sharia abiding countries. The parliament has only ini...

Pakistani Cricketers Anguish Over Kashmir, Or Their Inability To Play In IPL?

From the colonial times, cricket and politics remained an inseparable thing in the Indian subcontinent. Ashutosh Gowariker’s "Lagaan" gives a hint of when did they began mixing together. But the whole episode of Bhuvan ’s struggle of not paying the lagaan (taxes) to the British government —at times of monsoon crisis ( ghanan ghanan )— becomes small and insignificant, if politics over cricket between India and Pakistan is taken into account in the past few years. Just a few days before the commencement of Indian Premier League (IPL) 2018, Pakistani cricketers began to shower their ‘alleged’ love and sympathy for Kashmir, now when they know couldn't take part in IPL, they are showcasing their outrage on Twitter —not against IPL— but against Indian army and India as a state. After the 2008 Mumbai attacks, perpetrated by Pakistan based terror organization ' Lashkar-e-Taiba' , the Indian government has put a ban on Pakistani players from participating in I...

The Triple Talaq Argument: Fundamental Rights And Religious Obligations

The religious orthodoxy versus gender justice debate is not new. The debate has been ignited in the past from time to time challenging the sanctity of personal laws. The Muslim Personal Law Application Act, 1937, allows Indian Muslims to be governed by the  Shariat  (Islamic laws) based on Quran and  Hadith  (utterances of the Prophet) in matters of personal law. It is the Shayara Bano case that once again has ignited the debate. Shayara is a resident of Kashipur in Uttarakhand who was given an instantaneous triple talaq by her husband. She then approached the Supreme Court and filed a petition against practices of talaq-e-bidat (instantaneous triple talaq), nikah halala and polygamy. There are many progressive Muslim groups along with some secular bodies which demand to reform the unjust personal laws of the Muslim community. However, the All India Muslim Personal Law Board (AIMPLB) opposes any interference by the Supreme Court in matters of religious an...