Skip to main content

Accidental Prime Minister Compels India To Talk Manmohan Singh And Corruption Before Election, A Review

The media advisor to former prime minister Manmohan Singh, with his boring job, has been able to commercialize a story of his boss right to the screen. No one would have imagined this possibility when the book was launched in the midst of the 2014 election; when it also made a buzz with the allegations giving birth to controversies. But with the change of government after the election, things cooled down and people forgot their highly qualified yet good-for-nothing economist PM. Only till next election though.

Accidental Prime Minister poster
⭐⭐(2/5)

Directed by - Vijay Ratnakar Gutte
Starring - Anupam Kher, Akshaye Khanna, Suzanne Bernert
Storyline: Non-fiction, dramatized biography of former PM Manmohan Singh

Prime characters 
Sanjay Baru: Media advisor to the PM and the narrator
Manmohan Singh: The Accidental Prime Minister (2003-2014)
Sonia Gandhi: The villain-in-chief, is an evil Italian woman using proxies to get hold of power and control things remotely through Manmohan Singh
Rahul Gandhi: Incompetent leader unfit for politics and the son of Sonia Gandhi

Plot

Suzanne Bernert as Sonia Gandhi

The movie takes the viewers back to bad corrupt India acting as a reminder that how corrupt previous UPA government used to be. The film opens with the Congress-led UPA winning the 2004 Lok Sabha election and the drama that followed with Sonia Gandhi elected as the leader, who later had to refuse to be prime minister on the nationalists demand. But the ruling Party very carefully choosing someone whose loyalty can't be corrupted, no matter how corrupt government he is taking control of. So that the power remains with the noble family.

The main purpose of the movie, I presumed, was to take the aam aadmi (common citizens) to the inside of the power centre, something which is unknown and remains untapped. Though all I can say that it was a weird film which is neither a spoof nor a documentary but still attempts to show real-life politicians in a dramatic way, those who are directly involved in the power struggle. The advent of Narendra Modi to power toppling the corrupt government Dr Singh was made the commander of as the happy ending confirms the nexus between filmmakers and Bhakts. It begs the question if it is ethical in a democracy for a storytelling platform to be allowed in this way.

Cinematography

Being Manmohan Singh is certainly not easy as he has barely seen interacting with human emotions. The man has mostly seen delivering a formal-styled written speech with a light-blue turban. Very few people know who he was before his tenure as PM. Anupam Kher has tried his best but, on several moments, he appears to be totally different Manmohan Singh. Akshay Khanna in the shoes of Baru seems to be very enjoying, often connects to the audience directly breaking the fourth wall. But only with a bit of exaggeration. Suzanne Bernert as Sonia Gandhi has nailed it, especially her Hindi accent is totally heart-winning.

Arjun Mathur plays Rahul Gandhi

Side actors look impassive unable to put the required emotions. On several occasions, they appear out of place. Singh’s wife Gursharan Kaur (Divya Seth Shah) keeps saying: Aap Kucch kehte kyon nahi? Priyanka Gandhi (Aahana Kumra), just like her role in Indian politics, shows up very little on the screen but the makeup team has done their job well. Arjun Mathur playing Rahul Gandhi as an uninterested guy dumped in politics came as a disappointment as there was no scene of him watching chhota bheem or Pogo channel.

Impact On Realpolitik

I don't think it's going to make big difference in the upcoming election. Congress cannot demand a ban as it would be against the fundamental right of freedom of expression. It is ironic that the right which is supposed to topple the existing government has been timely used to maintain the status quo. It cannot be a coincidence for the film to be released months before the Lok Sabha elections. Electorates are often underestimated, sometimes mistaken as a pool of gullible idiots with no intellect. But time and again these misconception has been proven wrong with the result being veteran politicians and expert pollsters having to face dire humiliation.

Conclusion

Sanjay Baru did a damn right thing to present the story of Manmohan Singh to the people. Not for his retirement but to publicize the former PM for what he was, not the weakest prime minister but an accidental prime minister. A man of high intellect and integrity however a poor decision maker. Not the actual head of the corrupt unholy coalition government of UPA, but only a proxy. He was made a PM to make sure he never behave like one off camera. What suited him was the title “respected economist and professor” an intellectual man, not a political one. It would even be disrespectful for him to be called a rubber stamp PM. Just like it is for the president of India. Though the movie too doesn't do justice to Dr Singh as there are little attempts made to highlight his achievements as an economist.

Anupam Kher becomes Manmohan Singh, Akshay Khanna as Baru

But whatever Manmohan Singh was, he should not be exploted by powerful people to settle political self goals. If Sonia Gandhi used Dr Singh as her pawn to not lose her grip of power, Narendra Modi is no different. Manmohan Singh is not a multi-use dumping bag who can rescue the unfulfilled promises. Just like previous UPA government, former PM is being used by the present regime through proxies and for that reason, they cannot take a high moral ground for corruption and nepotism. The timing of the release of the movie raises questions whether the government is trying to cover up their failure.

The movie is a thumbs up for throwing some light on the lives of the Nehru-Gandhi India’s top political dynasty opening up a debate while a big thumbs down for imposing their opinion on the viewers about those who are still active in politics is obviously not good for democracy. But definitely, a pleasure to watch for the political enthusiasts. The characters which India learnt to detest during the era of scams are the ones brought to the stage for entertainment, which itself is quite entertaining. Only mind to not take it as a documentary film.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Marvels Of Board Exams

AFTER AN EXHILARATING HOLI, comes the boring and haunting board exam, the exam for which no amount of preparation gives an impression of sufficiency. Students across the nation get excited as well as depressed. They are ‘excitingly depressed’. Excited to give the final exam of their school life, to enter into a new world, and depressed thinking what society would say if their marks won't be that good. Sharma Ji’s meritorious child is making things worse. While the level of questions asked in the exams has become easy these days, the quality of students being produced is decreasing, WhatsApp, Social Media and expansion of internet are to blame. The internet and smartphones may help students in their higher studies, but it misfires in case of younger kids. It only serves as a distraction, the biggest of modern times. Earlier, when kids go out to play some sports , it was treated as a distraction from studies. But now, it has been understood clearly that it wasn't seeing...

The Story Behind WhatsApp Stirring Campaign To Stop Fake News And Rumours In India

After the government's timely reprimand to the ridiculously popular messaging app famous for reducing the barrier of distance between people, making business communication and note sharing easier — all with high privacy; and equally infamous for propagating provocative messages, fake news and rumours which, on several occasions, have resulted in the creation of a violent and murderous mob even costing lives of many, and then showing middle finger to the law enforcement bodies along with the judiciary, the app now appears to be taking things a little more seriously. The government, on last year, had slapped the Facebook-owned WhatsApp with legal notices with a clear warning that it would consider the messaging platform as an abettor in the spread of toxic rumours resulting in disharmony among citizens with law and order problems for the state, and will have to face the legal consequences in failing to put adequate checks for the same. As the world's largest democracy w...

The Whistle For The 2019 Political Battle Is Blown And The Bahubali Ready

ON THE VERY FIRST DAY OF 2019, with an exclusive interview to the ANI, Narendra Bahubali made his intentions crystal clear. That the Bahubali is not gratified with just one term and is ready to battle for the another. For the critics, it would be interesting to find out if there is going to be any Katappa or it’ll be a Katappa-less battle. Ok, let's be serious. Politics is a serious subject, no? Let’s talk about Smita Prakash who seems to be Mr Modi's preferred choice of journalists in order to move and shake the political discourse of the nation. Speaking of her, I must tell you, the lady is a very great listener. To interview someone like Modi, you need to be a good listener rather than a good speaker. Because, you know, he goes on and on… and on. Eventually, he ends up wooing you. Though not if you have some predefined political goals or loyalty to a particular party. The interview was much-needed from him to upgrade his party’s morale for the bigger battle ah...

The Official Arrival Of #MeToo In India

American civil rights activist and founder of neo-feminist movement #MeToo, Tarana Burke asked women to open up about sexual harassment they've experienced in the past, or facing it right now. She said, “ You don’t have to tell your story, you just have to say Me Too. ”  Since then, there have been shocking accounts of women describing their unfortunate experiences, and thereby holding a mirror to the civilised society. They range from stories of assault to stalking to intimidation. With each further account making clear that there was a systemic pattern of abuse and silence. Now as a hashtag, #MeToo symbolises solidarity and support of thousands and is today one of the most momentous contemporary movements globally. The reason for the success of this movement, obviously, is the popularity of social media and the involvement of many well-known people mainly from the entertainment industry of Hollywood. MeToo Arrives India Now, it seems that MeToo has arrived India. ...

Does India As A State Obliged Towards Her Citizens For Providing Them Employment?

As the Modi-led BJP government has failed to rescue India from Job crisis in its five-year term, the question is whether the government has done enough to maintain the equilibrium in the job market of the country? And whether or not the government should be held liable for creating this crisis in the first place? Screenshot from movie 3 idiots Article 41 {Right to work, to education and to public assistance in certain cases} under DPSP says: “The State shall, within the limits of its economic capacity and development, make effective provision for securing the right to work, to education and to public assistance in cases of unemployment, old age, sickness and disablement, and in other cases of undeserved want.” The DPSP cannot be enforced by any court, but the principles laid down in this part are nevertheless fundamental in the governance of the country, and it should be the duty of the State to apply these principles in making laws. We also need to look back to Mo...

The Padmavaat Circus — A Brief Summary

OVER THE LAST FEW MONTHS, the nation has witnessed a bizarre issue. We have been battling with the question of whether a film should be allowed to screen or not. It is definitely a matter of concern if a movie is not allowed to be showcased, and even more if the makers and artists receive threats. But, don't you think we gave it more importance than what it really deserved? It certainly was not worthy of the space for prime time debates every single day as if it is the “only” thing India is concerned about. From the beginning, I was appalled by the duration of time Padmavati remain in the news. After the news, they do a stupid TV debate about the same. We then also saw TV anchors giving a "no-objection certificate" to the movie happily. It was at a time when the film had not been even sent to the CBFC.  But, there was a journalist/anchor who was showing the educational crisis in the country instead of a frivolous debate of whether Padmavati to be allowed to rel...