Skip to main content

Accidental Prime Minister Compels India To Talk Manmohan Singh And Corruption Before Election, A Review

The media advisor to former prime minister Manmohan Singh, with his boring job, has been able to commercialize a story of his boss right to the screen. No one would have imagined this possibility when the book was launched in the midst of the 2014 election; when it also made a buzz with the allegations giving birth to controversies. But with the change of government after the election, things cooled down and people forgot their highly qualified yet good-for-nothing economist PM. Only till next election though.

Accidental Prime Minister poster
⭐⭐(2/5)

Directed by - Vijay Ratnakar Gutte
Starring - Anupam Kher, Akshaye Khanna, Suzanne Bernert
Storyline: Non-fiction, dramatized biography of former PM Manmohan Singh

Prime characters 
Sanjay Baru: Media advisor to the PM and the narrator
Manmohan Singh: The Accidental Prime Minister (2003-2014)
Sonia Gandhi: The villain-in-chief, is an evil Italian woman using proxies to get hold of power and control things remotely through Manmohan Singh
Rahul Gandhi: Incompetent leader unfit for politics and the son of Sonia Gandhi

Plot

Suzanne Bernert as Sonia Gandhi

The movie takes the viewers back to bad corrupt India acting as a reminder that how corrupt previous UPA government used to be. The film opens with the Congress-led UPA winning the 2004 Lok Sabha election and the drama that followed with Sonia Gandhi elected as the leader, who later had to refuse to be prime minister on the nationalists demand. But the ruling Party very carefully choosing someone whose loyalty can't be corrupted, no matter how corrupt government he is taking control of. So that the power remains with the noble family.

The main purpose of the movie, I presumed, was to take the aam aadmi (common citizens) to the inside of the power centre, something which is unknown and remains untapped. Though all I can say that it was a weird film which is neither a spoof nor a documentary but still attempts to show real-life politicians in a dramatic way, those who are directly involved in the power struggle. The advent of Narendra Modi to power toppling the corrupt government Dr Singh was made the commander of as the happy ending confirms the nexus between filmmakers and Bhakts. It begs the question if it is ethical in a democracy for a storytelling platform to be allowed in this way.

Cinematography

Being Manmohan Singh is certainly not easy as he has barely seen interacting with human emotions. The man has mostly seen delivering a formal-styled written speech with a light-blue turban. Very few people know who he was before his tenure as PM. Anupam Kher has tried his best but, on several moments, he appears to be totally different Manmohan Singh. Akshay Khanna in the shoes of Baru seems to be very enjoying, often connects to the audience directly breaking the fourth wall. But only with a bit of exaggeration. Suzanne Bernert as Sonia Gandhi has nailed it, especially her Hindi accent is totally heart-winning.

Arjun Mathur plays Rahul Gandhi

Side actors look impassive unable to put the required emotions. On several occasions, they appear out of place. Singh’s wife Gursharan Kaur (Divya Seth Shah) keeps saying: Aap Kucch kehte kyon nahi? Priyanka Gandhi (Aahana Kumra), just like her role in Indian politics, shows up very little on the screen but the makeup team has done their job well. Arjun Mathur playing Rahul Gandhi as an uninterested guy dumped in politics came as a disappointment as there was no scene of him watching chhota bheem or Pogo channel.

Impact On Realpolitik

I don't think it's going to make big difference in the upcoming election. Congress cannot demand a ban as it would be against the fundamental right of freedom of expression. It is ironic that the right which is supposed to topple the existing government has been timely used to maintain the status quo. It cannot be a coincidence for the film to be released months before the Lok Sabha elections. Electorates are often underestimated, sometimes mistaken as a pool of gullible idiots with no intellect. But time and again these misconception has been proven wrong with the result being veteran politicians and expert pollsters having to face dire humiliation.

Conclusion

Sanjay Baru did a damn right thing to present the story of Manmohan Singh to the people. Not for his retirement but to publicize the former PM for what he was, not the weakest prime minister but an accidental prime minister. A man of high intellect and integrity however a poor decision maker. Not the actual head of the corrupt unholy coalition government of UPA, but only a proxy. He was made a PM to make sure he never behave like one off camera. What suited him was the title “respected economist and professor” an intellectual man, not a political one. It would even be disrespectful for him to be called a rubber stamp PM. Just like it is for the president of India. Though the movie too doesn't do justice to Dr Singh as there are little attempts made to highlight his achievements as an economist.

Anupam Kher becomes Manmohan Singh, Akshay Khanna as Baru

But whatever Manmohan Singh was, he should not be exploted by powerful people to settle political self goals. If Sonia Gandhi used Dr Singh as her pawn to not lose her grip of power, Narendra Modi is no different. Manmohan Singh is not a multi-use dumping bag who can rescue the unfulfilled promises. Just like previous UPA government, former PM is being used by the present regime through proxies and for that reason, they cannot take a high moral ground for corruption and nepotism. The timing of the release of the movie raises questions whether the government is trying to cover up their failure.

The movie is a thumbs up for throwing some light on the lives of the Nehru-Gandhi India’s top political dynasty opening up a debate while a big thumbs down for imposing their opinion on the viewers about those who are still active in politics is obviously not good for democracy. But definitely, a pleasure to watch for the political enthusiasts. The characters which India learnt to detest during the era of scams are the ones brought to the stage for entertainment, which itself is quite entertaining. Only mind to not take it as a documentary film.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Exploring the Anglo-Norman Period in English Literature

 The Anglo-Norman period in English literature, roughly spanning from the Norman Conquest of 1066 to the mid-14th century, represents a pivotal era of transformation in the literary landscape of England. This period, initiated by William the Conqueror’s victory at the Battle of Hastings, brought profound cultural and linguistic changes that reshaped the production and development of literature in England. Below, we explore this dynamic period by examining its historical context, the dominance of French and Latin literature, the persistence and evolution of English literary traditions, and the lasting influence on the trajectory of English literature. Historical and Linguistic Context The Norman Conquest of 1066 marked a significant turning point for England, introducing a new ruling class of Norman French speakers. This event established a linguistic hierarchy : French became the language of the court, administration, and the elite; Latin remained the language of the church and sch...

Indian Rupee Demonetisation: Why It Cannot End Corruption Or Even Black Money

It was November 8, when Prime Minister Narendra Modi, in a dramatic announcement, decided to scrap or demonetise two high-value Indian currency of the denomination of ₹500 and ₹1000. It means 85% of currency in circulation will no longer be a legal tender. All that precious notes have been converted into wastepaper overnight. It became the biggest talking point in every Indian household  —  from Kashmir to Kanyakumari and from Kutch to Arunachal Pradesh. After all, in a country where 98% of all transactions are conducted in cash, it was a big jolt. Demonetisation is usually associated with degrading economies and hyperinflation and often done by military dictatorships. It was surprising that a popular and democratically elected prime minister of a booming economy has resorted to demonetisation. Black money is the money held by people that have evaded taxation. It is illegal hoarding of unaccounted money which tends to exacerbate inequality because the biggest evas...

Does India As A State Obliged Towards Her Citizens For Providing Them Employment?

As the Modi-led BJP government has failed to rescue India from Job crisis in its five-year term, the question is whether the government has done enough to maintain the equilibrium in the job market of the country? And whether or not the government should be held liable for creating this crisis in the first place? Screenshot from movie 3 idiots Article 41 {Right to work, to education and to public assistance in certain cases} under DPSP says: “The State shall, within the limits of its economic capacity and development, make effective provision for securing the right to work, to education and to public assistance in cases of unemployment, old age, sickness and disablement, and in other cases of undeserved want.” The DPSP cannot be enforced by any court, but the principles laid down in this part are nevertheless fundamental in the governance of the country, and it should be the duty of the State to apply these principles in making laws. We also need to look back to Mo...

A Reality Check of Bihar on Bihar Diwas

 It's 22 March Today. It's Bihar Diwas (Bihar Day), a very special day for Bihar and Biharis. It is a day of political and cultural awakening among Biharis. However, instead of just pushing jingoism, let's do a reality check on the present state of Bihar.  Bihar, historically a cradle of civilization with intellectual hubs like Nalanda and Vikramshila, faced economic decline over centuries due to colonial exploitation, natural disasters, and post-independence neglect. By the mid-20th century, the state struggled with poverty, unemployment, and underdevelopment, lagging behind India’s more industrialized or urbanized regions. This economic hardship pushed waves of Bihari laborers to migrate to cities like Delhi, Mumbai, Kolkata, Bengaluru, etc. in search of work, often taking up low-paying manual jobs—rickshaw pullers, construction workers, or street vendors. In these urban centers, they became visible symbols of rural poverty, and their sheer numbers made them an easy targe...

Making A Difference — Indian Media And Ravish Kumar

Today's Bulletin: Priya Prakash Varrier’s killing wink, Taimur’s daily schedule, 'Rashtramata' Padmavati , Donald Trump tweets, Different types of jihad - love jihad, hate jihad, cow jihad, North Korea’s ‘mental dictator’ Kim Jong Un's preparation for a nuclear war, and last, but not the least —An esteemed panel of 'alleged' experts and politicians engaging in an ‘alleged’ debate. If you are a consumer of Indian media, particularly the news channels, you might have got the idea of what my opening words are and where I’m trying to point it. If you think, all mediawallahs  (media personnel) are same, or that these are really important topics worthy of your time, you need to think again. Ravish during his hate-speech There is a 'proven' left-wing terrorist, and an atheist, perhaps, NDTV journo named Ravish Kumar who is different. The non-Hindi Indian states might not have heard his name. He is not interested in covering ‘big stories’, no loud ...

Modi’s Arrogance On The looming Job Crisis In India

An American theologian and author James Freeman Clarke once tried to differentiate between a politician and a statesman. In his article “ Wanted, a statesman ”, he writes “A politician thinks of the next election, while the statesman thinks of the next generation.” By this definition, Prime Minister Modi is not more than a politician. Though by other definition, he is not even a politician but merely an RSS pracharak . A politician thinks of the next election, while the statesman thinks of the next generation. The National Sample Survey Office(NSSO) latest survey on unemployment figures for 2017-18 rings a buzzing alarm to the situation of joblessness. The unemployment rate stands four decades high i.e., of 6.1 per cent during 2017-18. But instead of working to fix this problem, the government tried to cover up the data. NITI Aayog, which has a close affinity with the PMO, claimed that the report “was not finalized but at a draft stage” and also said that the past surveys...