Skip to main content

India China relations — The significance of Modi-Xi Meet


On April 28, 2018, Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Chinese President Xi Jinping in Wuhan were seen walking together along a sidewalk on the shores of the enchanting East Lake, a large freshwater lake in Wuhan city, also the largest urban lake in China. And this “relaxed and friendly”, in a bright and sunny atmosphere, meeting between the two leaders was publicized as an “Informal Summit”.

modi-xi at east lake

According to the government, Mr Modi and Mr Xi exchanged their views on major issues of bilateral and global importance and that they shared the view that, in the middle of current global uncertainties, peaceful, stable and balanced relations between India and China will be beneficial for the world. Even Pakistan.

They later enjoyed freshly prepared Chinese tea, and had a boat ride — the ride that was claimed to be a symbol of “peace, prosperity and development”.

After pondering over this for few hours, I did realize that the boat ride does represent something. Though still not sure about “peace, prosperity and development”, what I figured out is that it represents the bond of Asian heritage between the two nations sending out a message that they can get along together instead of holding grudge and antipathy against each other. That the two giants do not represent conflict but cooperation. That both of them together assert the vision of the Asian century. 

modi xi and china tea

My mind was full of optimism until realism started to knock the door shouting “Hey, diplomacy is not all about sipping tea and riding boat!”. Anyway, if an hour-long boat ride can solve the itchy issues between two global giants competing for their dominance, I don’t think there can be a better way than this.

The bilateral relations between the two Asian giants bilaterally is not too bad, it’s just “not good”. The dragon knows how to bully someone with one hand and do business with the other. There is a red carpet for one-way business while their communist red flag in someone else’s territory over which they have no sovereignty. But Mr Modi himself is a good businessman who knows how to keep unnecessary emotions out from his business — which presently is India’s business.

First and foremost concern that both countries share is to continue to expand their country’s economy and not letting it go haggard. In other words, they would like to maintain their pace of economic growth, if not accelerate it. It is India again which has to do a lot of hard-work of persuasion. To combat the massive trade imbalance with China which clearly has an upper hand with a huge trade surplus. If statistics are to be analyzed, India's imports ($61 billion) from China were six times its exports ($10 billion) in 2016-17. In the April-January period of 2017-18, India’s exports to China were $10.3 billion against imports of $63.2 billion leaving a trade gap of $52.9 billion. China has promised to reduce the same but India should not be content with the empty hopes.

Like the west, It is India’s large market that is luring the dragon. Chinese make affordable goods that are always in high demand in countries like India. Whatever bad they say about Chinese products, but it is the Chinese who make “everything” affordable.

Indians, especially kids, are already mesmerized by Chinese Kung-fu films and its most decorated superstar Jackie Chan. And, Chinese foods are available at every nooks and corner of the country. Notwithstanding all this exposure, there is very little cultural exchange happens between India and China, even when both countries being rich in culture. Now China, too, has begun to embrace Bollywood films like 3 idiots, Dangal and Aamir Khan. the government must remind Chinese that India is not just about Bollywood. Any efforts in further widening cultural exchange programmes and opening more tourist opportunities should be welcomed in both countries.

India does acknowledge the growing power disparity with China and recognizes it as a “superpower”. But, at the same time, consider the dragon largely irresponsible. When it acts according to whim. When the dragon invades its neighbour territory claiming it as its own. A Hindi term “dadagiri” can appropriately be utilized for China’s intimidating behaviour which means treating everyone as an inferior by those in a higher position.

While India needs China’s aid in certain things such as taming Pakistan based jihadist organizations, getting membership of the Nuclear Suppliers’ Group (NSG) — that China is blocking for a long time. India also wants China as a mutual trading partner not just playing the role of an importer but exporter too. Business or trade with the Chinese is here to stay, but it cannot go further. For security concerns the possibility of cooperation in defence is negligible.

During the standoff between Indian and Chinese armed forces at Dokalam, Chinese media which has tight control of the state was issuing “daily warning” to India. The governments at both sides got involved in a war of words. But, the two powers have behaved extremely well. It is the immunity of Modi and Xi that de-escalated tensions and settled the struggle peacefully. However, it is yet to be fully solved.

The border issue is not going to be solved between the two countries. The reason for this is China’s deliberate intentions for the same. By keeping the so-called border issues alive, China can invoke that any time to bully a state. It is actually an undeclared part of its foreign policy.

The last word

Both India and China are giants in terms of economy and population and certain other parameters, for that matters. On the global stage, China's military (PLA) is now increasingly flexing its muscles, unlike the Indian counterpart. The simultaneous emergence of the two countries as major global power could have caused far ugly consequences in the region as a result of the power struggle. It is perhaps the great Asian wisdom and the teachings of Buddha, that both India and China share, has prevented it so far.

Nevertheless, both countries know that they cannot be an “ally”, in its true sense, they can cooperate for their respective country’s economic growth and development. So when Modi and Xi met, it wasn't just meeting between two men but meeting of 1.25 billion Indians and 1.41 billion Chinese — about one-third of the world's population. They might have their differences, but they share the same goal — to make their economy grow and make their countrymen prosper. India-China relation is a fine example of conflict and cooperation at the same time.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Great Indian Bank Fraud - A Look Into PNB SCAM

India’s second largest bank, PNB, has been duped with a massive amount of 11400 cr by a billionaire jewellery designer Nirav Modi, now a fugitive. Before being named and investigated in the mega- bank-fraud, the celebrity designer has been featured in Forbes India's Richest People List 2016. Not to mention, Mr Modi has been seen in the World Economic Forum summit at Davos with PM Modi himself. It explains his network. There must be multiple levels of corruption involved in Nirav Modi scam — from the highest management in the bank to bureaucracy, all must have colluded together to make this scam come true. Netas, too, are part of big businessman-banker nexus as they are the ones who fund the election campaign secretly. To reiterate, political parties fundings still do not come under the scanner of RTI. Indian Banking Exposed PNB, in a statement, said that fraudulent transactions took place in one of its branches in Mumbai with their apparent connivance. A single br...

Does India As A State Obliged Towards Her Citizens For Providing Them Employment?

As the Modi-led BJP government has failed to rescue India from Job crisis in its five-year term, the question is whether the government has done enough to maintain the equilibrium in the job market of the country? And whether or not the government should be held liable for creating this crisis in the first place? Screenshot from movie 3 idiots Article 41 {Right to work, to education and to public assistance in certain cases} under DPSP says: “The State shall, within the limits of its economic capacity and development, make effective provision for securing the right to work, to education and to public assistance in cases of unemployment, old age, sickness and disablement, and in other cases of undeserved want.” The DPSP cannot be enforced by any court, but the principles laid down in this part are nevertheless fundamental in the governance of the country, and it should be the duty of the State to apply these principles in making laws. We also need to look back to Mo...

Why Unemployment Should Be The Blazing Problem For 2019 Election

In 2014, BJP in their campaign claimed that: there is no Modi-wave but it is the Tsunami of Narendra Modi (TsuNaMo). It now appears that the TsuNaMo was actually Tsunami of joblessness and has silently brought a massive disaster in India. The major victims are the young people who after finishing their education were hoping for a great career ahead. It is the TsuNaMo that has crushed their hope. Now that  chowkidar  Modi is going for his re-election, it's time to make him accountable. Image for representational purpose only If the 2014 election was fought on the issue of corruption, 2019 could have been fought on the issue of unemployment. But it doesn't seem to be progressing that way. As the election approaches, Indian weather is becoming hot with topics associated with nationalism such as Kashmir. The separatists and the  deshdrohis  speaking about  azadi  and removal of the army from disturbed areas of Kashmir only help ...

Accidental Prime Minister Compels India To Talk Manmohan Singh And Corruption Before Election, A Review

The media advisor to former prime minister Manmohan Singh, with his boring job, has been able to commercialize a story of his boss right to the screen. No one would have imagined this possibility when the book was launched in the midst of the 2014 election; when it also made a buzz with the allegations giving birth to controversies. But with the change of government after the election, things cooled down and people forgot their highly qualified yet good-for-nothing economist PM. Only till next election though. ⭐⭐ (2/5) Directed by - Vijay Ratnakar Gutte Starring - Anupam Kher, Akshaye Khanna, Suzanne Bernert Storyline: Non-fiction, dramatized biography of former PM Manmohan Singh Prime characters  Sanjay Baru: Media advisor to the PM and the narrator Manmohan Singh: The Accidental Prime Minister (2003-2014) Sonia Gandhi: The villain-in-chief, is an evil Italian woman using proxies to get hold of power and control things remotely through Manmohan Singh Rahul Gandhi: ...

The Triple Talaq Bill: A Final Step To Settle Gender Justice Debate Among Muslims

  Pixabay I’ve written a post earlier on the issue of triple talaq in June last year when the government opposed that in the Supreme Court. The SC held that talaq-e-biddat or instant triple talaq is unconstitutional, arbitrary and thus declared it void. Now, the legislation is being done with the continuation of the judicial declaration, with a triple talaq bill already been passed in the Lok Sabha and waiting to be passed in the Rajya Sabha. The bill shall provide a legal right to the Muslim women against this practice and make it a "criminal and non-bailable offence". But, some Islamic scholars and ‘secular’ politicians are questioning the authority of the Parliament. Isn’t it the Legislature that is formally authorised to initiate and bring reform in the society? Triple talaq is an unjust practice that has been carried out in independent India which is shameful. This practice has been even discontinued in many sharia abiding countries. The parliament has only ini...

Modi’s Arrogance On The looming Job Crisis In India

An American theologian and author James Freeman Clarke once tried to differentiate between a politician and a statesman. In his article “ Wanted, a statesman ”, he writes “A politician thinks of the next election, while the statesman thinks of the next generation.” By this definition, Prime Minister Modi is not more than a politician. Though by other definition, he is not even a politician but merely an RSS pracharak . A politician thinks of the next election, while the statesman thinks of the next generation. The National Sample Survey Office(NSSO) latest survey on unemployment figures for 2017-18 rings a buzzing alarm to the situation of joblessness. The unemployment rate stands four decades high i.e., of 6.1 per cent during 2017-18. But instead of working to fix this problem, the government tried to cover up the data. NITI Aayog, which has a close affinity with the PMO, claimed that the report “was not finalized but at a draft stage” and also said that the past surveys...

How Good Is Modi As A Reformer - An Analysis Of Modi's India

Before Prime Minister Modi's US visit and the first ever Modi-Trump meeting, several global media houses have analyzed the three years of Modi's government. They are doing their best to highlight the failure of the Modi government, downplaying all the achievements of India during three years. Of all those, the Economist magazine's analysis, I think, is the one that deserves good attention. According to the Economist, prime minister Narendra Modi is not much as a big reformer as he seems . In the beginning, the article gives some credit to Modi for boosting the economic growth of India. It says, before the arrival of Modi, India was growing at a relatively slower rate of 6.4% than after the 2014 election. In 2015, India became the world's fastest growing economy with a growth rate of 7.9%. It also mentioned the economic reforms like GST and Bankruptcy law which have been successfully passed by the legislature. But, then, it says "These facts are decei...